South Korea's President Lee Seeks Incremental, Consensus-Driven Constitutional Reform

President Lee Jae-myung spoke at a cabinet meeting at the Sejong Government Complex, saying the government should not yet take the lead on constitutional reform, but it should pursue aspects it can advance. He stressed that the government is not at a stage to drive amendments, but that progress on feasible items should be pursued.

Lee cited remarks by Oh Won-sik, the speaker of the National Assembly, who suggested tackling constitutional changes in a sequence that starts with issues the public can broadly agree on. He indicated that such an approach could help build consensus.

On May 18, 1998; at around 4.00 p.m. WIT the House Leaders made a press statement to respond to the people's aspirations that for the sake of the nation's unity and cohesion, the President should wisely and sagaciously resign.
Representative image for context; not directly related to the specific event in this article. License: Public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

Among the ideas Lee mentioned were including the May 18 spirit in the Constitution’s preamble, a proposal often floated by opposition parties. He also noted potential reforms aimed at strengthening local autonomy and tightening the conditions for invoking martial law, suggesting those are areas where public and political support might exist.

The president added that some in the opposition have advocated combining references to the May 18 uprising with the Bu-Ma protests—an early pro-democracy movement in Busan and Masan—into the constitutional framework. He said it might be better to address these points together if reform proceeds.

Lee’s remarks reflect ongoing, nuanced dialogue over constitutional reform in Korea, a longstanding political issue that tests cross-party consensus and could influence domestic governance and policy directions. He signaled a cautious, if purposeful, approach rather than a government-led overhaul.

Lee Mison in a suit after his inauguration as a justice (2019).
Representative image for context; not directly related to the specific event in this article. License: CC BY-SA 4.0. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

For U.S. readers, the developments matter because Korea’s constitutional framework shapes its governance, civil liberties, and emergency powers—issues with direct implications for security cooperation, defense planning, and regulatory stability that underpins U.S.-South Korea ties. Clear, predictable policymaking supports stability in a key ally and security partner in the Indo-Pacific.

Context for non-Korean readers: May 18 refers to the 1980 Gwangju Uprising, a pivotal event in Korea’s democratic transition, while the Bu-Ma protests occurred in 1979 as a pro-democracy movement in Busan and Masan. The constitutional preamble is a symbolic opening clause that states the nation’s guiding principles, making these proposed insertions highly consequential in how Korea frames its democratic values.

Subscribe to Journal of Korea

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe