U.S. says KC-135 crash in western Iraq not enemy action; casualties unknown

The U.S. military’s Central Command (CENTCOM) said on X that one KC-135 air-refueling aircraft was lost in an incident in friendly airspace during the ongoing operation, with two aircraft involved. The crash occurred in western Iraq, while another KC-135 landed safely. CENTCOM said the incident was not the result of an enemy attack or misfire and that rescue efforts were under way, with further updates to come.

AP cited officials saying the downed aircraft carried at least five people. Casualties and the full extent of injuries remained unconfirmed as personnel conducted search-and-rescue operations at the scene. The KC-135 is not equipped with ejection seats, and officials noted that since 2008 the Air Force has ceased crew parachute escape provisions for this model, making in-flight emergency egress unlikely. A separate official said the aircraft that landed safely was also a KC-135.

U.S. Navy sailors assigned to the crash and salvage team transport the mobile salvage crane on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) in the Arabian Gulf. Harry S. Truman was deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility.
Representative image for context; not directly related to the specific event in this article. License: Public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

The United States currently operates roughly 400 KC-135 tankers. While the loss is not expected to appreciably degrade immediate warfighting capabilities, it nonetheless raises political and logistical pressures amid a broader, prolonged posture in the region. President Trump’s administration is facing mounting domestic opposition to a long campaign aimed at Iran as casualties accumulate.

Public sentiment reflected that tension. A Washington Post poll conducted June 6–9 among 1,005 American adults found 42% favored halting strikes against Iran, while 34% supported continuing them; more than 60% said they could not accept the casualties tied to the current level of U.S. military action, signaling potential political liability for policymakers.

A damaged U.S. Navy Curtiss XBTC-2 being lifted by a crane following a landing accident. Among the aircraft procured by the Navy for evaluation as a bombing-torpedo aircraft, the XBTC-2 was a single-seater that featured a 3,000 hp Pratt & Whitney XR-4360-8A equipped with unique contrarotating propellers. Curtiss-Wright received the contract for the aircraft on 31 December 1943, but the XBTC-2 did not take to the air for its maiden flight until July 1946. This was well after the first flights of the Douglas XBT2D-1 Skyraider and Martin XBTM-1 Mauler that were ultimately chosen to compete for the contract.
Representative image for context; not directly related to the specific event in this article. License: Public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

On costs, U.S. Air Force data show the KC-135’s unit price at about $39.6 million in fiscal year 1998. Adjusted for inflation to February 2026, that figure is around $79.4 million in today’s dollars, underscoring the financial stakes of losses in a era of expensive, high-availability air-refueling capacity.

The incident underscores the risks faced by support aircraft that enable broader air operations in the Middle East, even as CENTCOM and U.S. officials emphasize that the event was not caused by enemy action or miscalculation. With ongoing concerns about Iran-related military activity and domestic attitudes toward such operations, the broader strategic and political landscape in which U.S. forces operate remains unsettled for policymakers and markets alike.

Subscribe to Journal of Korea

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe