South Korea party faction demands accountability amid Kim Eo-jun News Factory controversy
A South Korean political faction allied with the party’s pro-Lee Jae-myung wing issued a sharp critique of Kim Eo-jun’s News Factory on the 13th, tying it to the controversy over what supporters call a “prosecution drop trade.” The group, The Democratic Nationwide Innovation Council, said Kim Eo-jun News Factory should not dodge accountability and urged clear apologies, reflection, and measures to prevent the spread of unverified allegations.
The commentary argued that if a media outlet claims to operate in the new media era, it must also meet corresponding standards of responsibility and ethics. It pressed for accountability commensurate with the platform’s reach and influence.

Earlier, former MBC journalist Jang In-su appeared on Kim Eo-jun’s YouTube program and claimed that a high-ranking government official close to President Lee Jae-myung told top prosecutors to drop charges, implying the government would “trade” with investigators. The Democratic Party filed defamation and false-information charges against Jang, while Kim Eo-jun was not charged.
Kim Eo-jun responded on his YouTube channel, questioning why News Factory should apologize given its large audience, and saying that if lawsuits arise, they would defend themselves, framing the claims as unfounded. He signaled a readiness to contest legal action.
The Innovation Council contended that Kim Eo-jun News Factory played a decisive role in spreading the allegations and said the program was excluded from charges on grounds of legal review. They asserted that the program bears responsibility for the content it popularizes and public discussion it shapes.

Critics within the party argued that the absence of a corrective apology reflects poorly on the standards expected of a responsible, modern media platform that engages in political discourse. They warned that allowing such conduct without accountability undermines public trust.
For international readers, the episode highlights how media personalities, online platforms, and political factions interact in South Korea’s dynamic democracy. It underscores ongoing tensions over press freedom, accountability, and the use of defamation laws in a digitally driven information landscape. The case matters to U.S. audiences because South Korea remains a key ally in technology, security, and trade, where media narratives can influence public opinion, policy debates, and investor sentiment in a highly connected regional economy.